Stormwater
Management Reports

A Stormwater Management Report (SWM Report) demonstrates how a development site will manage stormwater runoff — addressing quantity, quality, and water balance to the satisfaction of the municipality and, where applicable, the local conservation authority. Ontario’s SWM guidelines require that post-development peak flow rates do not exceed pre-development rates for design storm events, typically the 2-year, 5-year, and 100-year return periods.

Quality control requirements specify minimum Total Suspended Solids (TSS) removal rates that vary depending on the receiving water body classification. Water balance requirements address groundwater recharge, particularly in areas identified as sensitive recharge zones. For sites in or near regulated areas, the report must also satisfy the relevant conservation authority’s requirements, which may be more stringent than the municipality’s.

The SWM Report is typically submitted alongside the FSR as part of the servicing component of a development application. A licensed P.Eng. prepares and seals the report. Depending on site complexity, the SWM Report may include detailed hydrologic modelling, pond sizing calculations, and Low Impact Development (LID) documentation.

When You Need One

  • Site Plan Approval (SPA)
  • Draft plan of subdivision or condominium
  • Conservation authority permit applications
  • ZBA where stormwater is identified as a planning issue
  • Building permit for larger impervious areas (municipality-dependent)
  • Any site with a significant change to drainage patterns

What’s Included

  • Pre-development and post-development hydrology
  • Storm sewer sizing and routing
  • Quantity control analysis (2yr, 5yr, 25yr, 100yr)
  • Quality control design (TSS removal calculation)
  • Water balance and groundwater recharge analysis
  • On-site storage sizing (OSD) where required
  • Low Impact Development (LID) measure documentation
  • Coordination with conservation authority requirements
“SWM reports that came back for multiple revisions almost always had the same issues: incomplete water balance analysis, quality control calculations that didn’t match the proposed pond design, or LID documentation that was more aspirational than technical. Reviewers check the numbers, not just the narrative. The calculations need to be reproducible and directly tied to the design drawings.”

Ready to get started?

Most projects start with a 20-minute call. Tell us about your site and your timeline.